Table 2 Were the Proctor et al. (2013) implementation strategy measurement reporting prerequisites met for virtual facilitation (VF)?
From: Virtual facilitation best practices and research priorities: a scoping review
First author (year) | Study design | Practice setting | VF only vs. part of package? | Were Proctor reporting prerequisites met for virtual facilitation (VF)? | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name VF? | Define VF? | Specify who provides VF? | Specify actions that comprise VF? | Specify target of VF? | Specify when VF used? | Specify dosage of VF? | Specify implementation outcome affected? | Specify justification for VF? | ||||
Jortberg (2022) [20] | Qualitative | Primary care | – | Yes | Yes | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes (COVID) |
Fox (2013) [21] | Cluster RCT protocol | Primary care | Part of package | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (geographically remote sites) |
Hartmann (2021) [16] | Description of best practices | N/A | VF only | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Yes (COVID) |
Lindsay (2017) [22] | Qualitative | VA; tele-health (rural) | Part of package | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No (rural) |
Smelson (2022) [23] | Hybrid III modified stepped-wedge trial | VA (suburban and rural) 2 VAMC and 7 homeless centers | VF only vs. VF + IF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No (suburban and rural) |
Ecker (2023) [24] | Mixed methods | VA | VF only | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
Malone (2021) [25] | Protocol of cluster randomized stepped-wedge trial | Children’s hospitals (urban multiple centers) | VF only | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Bednar (2023) [26] | Multi-site mixed methods program evaluation | Cancer centers (multiple urban centers) | Part of package | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes (multiple centers) |