Table 3 Integration of Implementation Science Methods (n=24)

Implementation Focus

 Studies examining implementation determinants

16 (62.5%)

 Studies examining implementation outcomes

12 (50.0%)

 Studies evaluating implementation strategies

6 (25.0%)

Application of Implementation Science Frameworks and Taxonomies

 IS framework used for measure development and selection

12 (50.0%)

 IS framework used for data analysis and coding

9 (37.5%)

 IS framework used for framing introduction, study justification, discussion

16 (66.7%)

 IS framework identified but not applied

2 (8.3%)

 Unspecified/not enough info to code

1 (4.2%)

CFIR Domains Categorizing Implementation Determinants (n = 16)

 Inner setting

14 (87.5%)

 Outer setting

10 (62.5%)

 Implementation process

6 (37.5%)

 Characteristics of individuals

5 (31.3%)

 Intervention characteristics

5 (31.3%)

Implementation Outcomes (n = 12)

 Acceptability

5 (41.7%)

 Feasibility

4 (33.3%)

 Penetration/reach

2 (16.7%)

 Appropriateness

1 (8.3%)

 Fidelity

1 (8.3%)

 Cost

1 (8.3%)

 Sustainability

1 (8.3%)

 Adoption

1 (8.3%)

 Other

2 (16.7%)

 Unspecified

1 (8.3%)