Table 1 Study citation, purpose, methods

[26]

Conduct a pre-implementation assessment to describe existing correctional HIV policies and practices and to identify gaps in HIV testing, prevention and treatment services.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 9 state departments of correction, 2 county Sheriff's Departments, 23 prisons, 14 jails

[27]

Examine barriers and facilitators of the planning and implementation of a collaborative initiative between the Health Department and jail to provide HPV vaccinations

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 13 administrators and staff (7 from the health department and 6 from the jail)

[28]

Assess the implementation and sustainment of delivering medications for opioid use disorder in two jails and two prison systems.

Design: Observational: longitudinal

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 4 study sites

[29]

Assess the effectiveness of an organizational linkage intervention on staff perceptions of and willingness to refer to addiction pharmacotherapy.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 20 sites (10 control, 10 experimental)

[30]

Conduct a formative evaluation of the implementation of a treatment intervention for justice-involved people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 28 meetings with stakeholders, 4 focus groups with staff, and policymakers, 2 focus groups with current participants , 10 interviews with program graduates

[31]

Assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy for women and men with major depressive disorder in a prison setting.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 181 people in prison

[32]

To describe perspectives on and implementation determinants of the implementation of interpersonal psychotherapy delivered a in prison settings.

Design: Observational: longitudinal

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 71 providers and administrators from prison facilities; 90 people in prison

[33]

Compare the organizational readiness for change and other organizational factors related to evidence-based practice use across correctional settings and community-based residential and outpatient programs for substance use disorder.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 165 correctional staff, 256 community residential, 267 community outpatient)

[34]

Examine organizational characteristics and processes that lead to successful implementation of HIV-STIC.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 17 dyads of researchers and sponsors

[35]

Examine the influence of correctional agencies and community substance use treatment programs organizational structure as a determinant for providing HIV testing practices.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 289 corrections administrators; 217 substance use treatment directors

[36]

Measure fidelity to the HIV Services and Treatment Implementation in Corrections (HIV-STIC) implementation strategy and document reasons for adapting and modifying the implementation strategy.

Design: Observational: longitudinal

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 28 correctional facilities

[37]

Assess the impact of a process improvement intervention for improving HIV services for people under correctional supervision.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 14 research centers

[38]

Assess the feasibility of implementing the risk needs responsivity treatment planning support tool in a case management and peer support intervention for individuals with co-occurring disorders.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 55 participants in reentry program; 21 staff members

[39]

Identify organizational characteristics impacting the success of an organizational change strategy to improve assessment and case planning processes with people living with substance use disorder.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 659 staff members from 21 study sites

[40]

To describe the processes and strategies for translating correctional nursing standards into practice.

Design: Observational: longitudinal

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 444 correctional nurses

[41]

Explore implementation determinants of jail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution programming.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 34 participants across 3 counties

[42]

To test the impact of a change team model implementation strategy on improving awareness of and linkage to HIV services and sustaining new services.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 2,301 people incarcerated

[43]

Assess determinants that impact implementation of specialty mental health probation.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 26 staff members from probation and mental health and substance use services administrators

[44]

Describe implementation of specialty mental health probation, including perspectives on core intervention components, how probation officers approach implementation, and resources needed to optimize implementation.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 16 probation officers and supervisors

[45]

Assess the impact of a change team model implementation strategy on perceived value of HIV services among staff of correctional and community HIV organizations.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Quantitative

Sample: 379 administrators and staff from 28 prisons, jails, or work release centers and community agencies

[46]

Assess the factors that impact sustainability of improvements made in a HIV service intervention.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 9 sites, including 9 principal investigators and 8 executive sponsors

[47]

Test an organizational linkage intervention using local change teams to connect individuals on community supervision to community-based medication-assisted treatment.

Design: Experimental (random assignment, experimental group)

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 10 sites in the experimental group; 10 sites in TAU

[48]

To adapt and assess the effectiveness of an intervention to improve clinical and cultural competence for providing healthcare services to transgender clients.

Design: Pre-experimental (pre-test/post-test)

Data: Qualitative, quantitative

Sample: 34 correctional healthcare providers

[49]

Identify factors that contributed to implementation and sustainment of a therapy for survivors of sexual violence incarcerated in women's prisons.

Design: Observational: single point

Data: Qualitative

Sample: 13 program stakeholders, 22 incarcerated women