Skip to main content

Table 1 Potential survey measures for aim 2

From: Using audience segmentation to identify implementation strategies to improve PrEP uptake among at-risk cisgender women: a mixed-methods study protocol

i-PARIHS construct

Potential items and scales

Innovation (e.g., degree of fit with existing practice and values; usability; relative advantage)

Scope of practice: Do you consider PrEP prescription and monitoring within you scope of practice? (Yes/No)

Comfort: (1) How comfortable do you currently feel prescribing PrEP to MSM? (2) How comfortable do you currently feel prescribing PrEP to cis women? (5-point Likert scale, Very Uncomfortable to Very Comfortable)

Patient risk: How at risk do you think your general patient population is for HIV? (5-point Likert scale, Not at risk at all to Very High Risk);

Usability: perceptions of barriers to provision of PrEP, 7 items [23]

Recipients (e.g., values and beliefs, skills and knowledge)

PrEP Knowledge, 6 items [59]

HIV-related stigma among providers, 6 items [60]

Beliefs, attitudes, and concerns about PrEP, 8 items [61]

Openness: How open are you to receiving more information and support about the provision of PrEP for cis women? (5-point Likert scale, Not Open at All to Very Open)

Behavior: Have you ever prescribed PrEP to a cis-gender woman before? (Yes/No)

Context (e.g., organizational culture; leadership and management support)

Practice type (family planning, reproductive health, LGBT health)

PARIHS Contextual Readiness to Change Scale [62]

Availability of benefits navigation support in organization (Yes/No/Unsure)

Perceived provider autonomy in clinic [62]

Perceived clinic team effectiveness [62]